Bublitz v. Brownlee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the district court retains jurisdiction, “so long as the injunctive relief [that triggers the payment of money] is of sufficient importance relative to the monetary award to support jurisdiction”
• “This Court has no jurisdiction ... if the plaintiffs suit is essentially one for non-tort damages exceeding $10,000, regardless of whether the plaintiff has cloaked his complaint in injunctive terms.”
• the district court retains jurisdiction, “so long as the injunctive relief [that triggers the payment of money] is of sufficient importance relative to the monetary award to support jurisdiction”
• without citing to “any statute, rule or regulation that may have been 9 violated by the disclosed conduct,” the plaintiff lacked “any foundation for the reasonableness of his 10 belief”
• “This Court has no jurisdiction . . . if the plaintiff’s suit is essentially one for non-tort damages exceeding $10,000, regardless of whether the plaintiff has cloaked his complaint in injunctive terms.”
• transferring case to Court of Federal Claims in similar circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).