B&T Business Ventures v. Disi Bros. Land, L.L.C.
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 2113
Syllabus
SUMMARY JUDGMENT — CIV.R. 56 — DISCOVERY — QUIET-TITLE ACTION — UNJUST ENRICHMENT: trial court did not err by granting summary judgment in favor of defendant where defendant met its Civ.R. 56(E) burden of proof, plaintiff had ample opportunity to conduct discovery prior to the trial court's judgment, and plaintiff failed to rebut the assertions in defendant's motion for summary judgment with regard to defendant's sole ownership of the property in question and the fact that defendant was not unjustly enriched as defendant never received a financial benefit from the lease-to-own agreement that was between codefendant and plaintiff.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In some circumstances, mandamus may be used to compel a public officer to perform a discretionary act, but not to exercise that discretion in any particular manner.”
- statutory interpretation is a question of law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.