BS&B SAFETY SYSTEMS v. EDGERTON

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that police officers’ charge to protect the public differentiated them from the public
• noting that \aliens lawfully residing in this society have many rights which are accorded to noncitizens by few other countries\
• holding constitutional a New York law limiting appointment to state police force to citizens
• holding constitutional a New York law limiting appointment to state police force to citizens
• explaining that matters involving children are one of the “most sensitive areas of daily” that an officer must respond to and requires “difficult and delicate judgments” underpinning the rationale for qualified immunity
• clarifying that the Graham court’s rationale for subjecting alienage-based classifications to “heightened judicial solicitude” was that “aliens—pending their eligibility for citizenship—have no direct voice in the political processes” (citing Carolene Prods., 304 U.S. at 152-53 n.4)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).