Third Circuit· 1/8/2013

B.S. Ex Rel. T.S. v. Somerset County

Citations

704 F.3d 250
2013 WL 69211
2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 443

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that suits seeking redress for injuries traceable to defendants' actions, rather than the state court orders themselves, are not barred by Rooker - Feldman
holding that Rooker-Feldman doctrine did not preclude subject matter jurisdiction where injury claimed was “traceable to Appellees’ actions, as opposed to the state court orders those actions allegedly caused”
holding that it would be “hard to imagine” an instance in which fiscal and administra- tive burdens would justify the absence of any hearing at all
applying the Mathews test to evaluate whether there was the opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner
“Speaking generally, however, it should be obvious that a hearing 40 days later is not sufficiently prompt.”
reversing the grant of summary judgment to the county on the plaintiffs procedural due process claim, but affirming on her substantive due process and other claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fuentes, Jordan, Nygaard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.