B.S. Ex Rel. T.S. v. Somerset County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that suits seeking redress for injuries traceable to defendants' actions, rather than the state court orders themselves, are not barred by Rooker - Feldman
• holding that Rooker-Feldman doctrine did not preclude subject matter jurisdiction where injury claimed was “traceable to Appellees’ actions, as opposed to the state court orders those actions allegedly caused”
• holding that it would be “hard to imagine” an instance in which fiscal and administra- tive burdens would justify the absence of any hearing at all
• applying the Mathews test to evaluate whether there was the opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner
• “Speaking generally, however, it should be obvious that a hearing 40 days later is not sufficiently prompt.”
• reversing the grant of summary judgment to the county on the plaintiffs procedural due process claim, but affirming on her substantive due process and other claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).