Bryson v. Gere

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining why diversity cases may raise the issue of whether to apply state or federal collateral estoppel law
• permitting defensive use of collateral estoppel against the plaintiff in the prior action
• although arbitration clauses need not expressly state that they are “mandatory,” there must nevertheless be “other indications” of an intent to consent to binding arbitration
• “[Pjlaintiffs remaining issues ... are so central to the dispute that the arbitrator was obliged to, and did, consider them.”
• although arbitration clauses need not expressly state that they are “mandatory,” there must nevertheless be “other indications” of an intent to consent to binding arbitration
• “A judgment is valid when it was rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).