District of Columbia· 6/26/2003

Bryson v. Gere

Citations

268 F. Supp. 2d 46
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11012
2003 WL 21489895

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining why diversity cases may raise the issue of whether to apply state or federal collateral estoppel law
permitting defensive use of collateral estoppel against the plaintiff in the prior action
although arbitration clauses need not expressly state that they are “mandatory,” there must nevertheless be “other indications” of an intent to consent to binding arbitration
“[Pjlaintiffs remaining issues ... are so central to the dispute that the arbitrator was obliged to, and did, consider them.”
although arbitration clauses need not expressly state that they are “mandatory,” there must nevertheless be “other indications” of an intent to consent to binding arbitration
“A judgment is valid when it was rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lamberth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.