Brycki v. Brycki

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requirement that court must determine whether sepa- ration agreement is fair and equitable described as ‘‘peculiar to settlement agreements in the area of fam- ily law’’
• Practice Book § 66-7 affords review of decision on motion for articulation filed pursu- ant to Practice Book § 66-5 only, which motion may be filed only after appeal has been filed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commissioner of Transportation v. Larobina
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2005-10-18· cited 18×
• Swanson v. City of Groton
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-09-08· cited 16×
• Crews v. Crews
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2008-04-29· cited 10×
• City of Hartford v. McKeever
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2012-11-27· cited 8×
• Aley v. Aley
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2006-10-10· cited 7×
• DeMattio v. Plunkett
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2020-08-25· cited 7×
• Karen v. Loftus
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2024-09-17· cited 4×
• O'Brien v. Davis
  Connecticut Superior Court· 2005-09-29
• Duclos v. Hayes
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2025-08-19

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Audubon Parking Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Barclay & Stubbs, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-06-15· cited 144×
• Sicaras v. City of Hartford
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1997-04-22· cited 76×
• Ayala v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-02-20· cited 57×
• Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone v. Rocque
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-12-23· cited 41×
• Chyung v. Chi Han Chyung
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2004-12-28· cited 33×
• Maharishi School of Vedic Sciences, Inc. v. Connecticut Constitution Associates Ltd. Partnership
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-07-02· cited 32×
• DAP Financial Management Co. v. Mor-Fam Electric, Inc.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2000-07-25· cited 20×
• Gladstone, Schwartz, Baroff & Blum v. Hovhannissian
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1999-05-04· cited 17×
• Provenzano v. Provenzano
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2005-03-29· cited 12×
• Falkenstein v. Falkenstein
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2004-08-17· cited 11×
• Matka Corp. v. Automated Material Handling, Inc.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1994-06-02· cited 4×