Bryceland v. Northey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing restrictive covenants may be used to protect employee’s use of confidential information
• noting without deciding, that “the restriction against employment by any ‘potential customer or client’ of Bryceland may be overly broad”
• “We will interpret a contract in a manner which gives a reasonable meaning to the manifested intent of the parties rather than an interpretation that would render the contract unreasonable”
• two-year restriction unreasonable because company needed far less time to find 21 replacement
• “Each case hinges on its own particular facts.”
• “Each case hinges on its own particular facts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).