Bryce Thomas Means v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a new original claim existed with \an intervening change in law providing a new cause of action\
• explaining that “basic principles of finality and res judicata apply to . . . agency decisions” that have not been appealed and have become final
• “When the predicate evidence is established that triggers the presumption, the further evidentiary gap is filled by the presumption.”
• “[A] presumption affords a party, for whose benefit the presumption runs, the luxury of not having to produce specific evidence to establish the point at issue.”
• applying finality and res judicata to VA decisions
• considering 38 C.F.R. § 3.306 (1992)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).