Bryant v. Yellen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that residents who desired to purchase farmlands had standing to challenge a court decision holding inapplicable a land reclamation law where it was likely that lands would become available at less than market prices if the law were applicable
• recogniz-ing that present perfected rights constitute a limitation on Interior’s power to distribute water from the Colorado River
• finding that movants had standing to intervene “even though they could not with certainty establish” that they would in fact be harmed by the Department’s adverse action
• holding prej- udice required to reverse for government misconduct in Sixth Amend- ment context
• finding standing where it was “likely” that relief requested by plaintiffs would result in benefit they hoped for
• allowing intervention by individuals who might be able buy land “at prices below the market value for irrigated lands” depending on the outcome of the underlying litigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).