Bryant v. Wake Forest Univ. Baptist Med. Ctr.
Syllabus
medical malpractice object left in body during surgery summary judgment was proper on claims for actual and constructive fraud because there was no evidence of deceptive intent or fiduciary relationship between physician and patient res ipsa loquitor did not apply because elements of both standard of care and breach required expert testimony summary judgment on medical malpractice claim was proper because four-year rather than ten-year statute of limitations applied because evidence was uncontroverted that object left in body was intended to be left in body permanently for purpose of medical treatment punitive damages claim failed where all other claims did not withstand summary judgment
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.