Bryant v. Stevenson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• directing that district courts should not dismiss the claim of a self-represented party without granting leave to amend at least once “when a liberal reading of the complaint gives any indication that a valid claim might be stated.”
• “First Amendment retaliation claims brought by prisoners must be ‘supported by specific and detailed factual allegations,’ not stated ‘in wholly conclusory terms.’” (citation omitted)
• “First Amendment retaliation claims brought by prisoners must be ‘supported by specific and detailed factual allegations,’ not stated ‘in wholly conclusory terms.’” (citation omitted)
• “[A] pro se complaint should not [be] dismiss[e]d without [the Court] granting leave to amend at least once when a liberal reading of the complaint gives any indication that a valid claim might be stated.”
• “It is well established that retaliation against a prisoner for pursuing a grievance violates the right to petition [the] government for the redress of grievances guaranteed by the First and Fourteenth Amendments and is actionable under § 1983.”
• “It is well established that retaliation against a prisoner for pursuing a grievance violates the right to petition [the] government for the redress of grievances guaranteed by the First and Fourteenth Amendments and is actionable under § 1983.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).