Skip to main content

Bryant v. State

Citations

  • 301 Ga. 617
  • 800 S.E.2d 537
  • 2017 WL 2332647
  • 2017 Ga. LEXIS 435

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that trial counsel was deficient for failing to raise particularity challenge to search warrant that “did not describe the items to be seized at all” (citation and punctuation omitted; emphasis in original)
  • concluding that a search warrant that “did not describe the items to be seized at all” was “so obviously deficient” that the ensuing search had to be regarded as “warrantless”
  • explaining that a search warrant that does not particularly describe the things to be seized violates the Fourth Amendment
  • trial counsel ineffective for failing to challenge warrant that failed to describe items to be seized at all
  • defendant was prejudiced by trial counsel’s failure to seek exclusion of evidence that violated his Fourth Amendment rights; defendant was entitled to new trial
  • Where “executing officers [do] not have a warrant particularly describing the items they intend[] to seize, the search [is] presumptively unreasonable and unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boggs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.