Supreme Court of Kansas· 9/2/2005
Bryant v. State
Citations
- 280 Kan. 2
- 118 P.3d 685
- 2005 Kan. LEXIS 451
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- attorney was not ineffective for failing to predict a judicial ruling that had not been yet announced
- invocation of McAdam will be unsuccessful if defendant pled guilty and no direct appeal was taken and invocation occurs for first time on collateral attack
- defendant “did waive a challenge to his sentence by not appealing the sentence”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allegrucci, Locket
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. PattonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-11-14· cited 94×
- Haddock v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas· 2006-11-09· cited 59×
- Laymon v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas· 2005-11-10· cited 55×
- State v. PhinneySupreme Court of Kansas· 2005-11-10· cited 55×
- Luurtsema v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-01-05· cited 52×
- State v. ProctorCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2012-07-06· cited 21×
- State v. ScovilleSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-08-01· cited 7×
- State v. McCarleyCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2007-09-19· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.