Bryant v. New York State Department of Correction Services Albany

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that it is “beyond dispute” that New York and its agencies have not consented to being sued in federal court (internal quotation marks omitted)
• noting that it is “beyond dispute” that New York and its agencies have not consented to being sued in federal court (citations and quotation marks omitted)
• noting that it is “beyond dispute” that New York and its agencies have not consented to being sued in federal court (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• noting it is “beyond dispute” that New York and its agencies have not consented to being sued in federal court (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “Sing Sing, as a part of DOCS, a state agency, is considered an arm of the state and stands in the same position as the State.”
• DOCCS, then known as Department of Correction Services, enjoys Eleventh Amendment immunity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).