Skip to main content

Bryant v. Livigni

Citations

  • 619 N.E.2d 550
  • 250 Ill. App. 3d 303
  • 188 Ill. Dec. 925

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that imputation to principal is proper “if the information concerns a matter within the scope of the agent’s authority.”
  • agent's knowledge concerning fellow employee's dangerous propensities is \chargeable to the corporation if the information concerns a matter within the scope of the agent's authority\
  • “[W]hether the agent 26 No. 1-24-2044 the source of that knowledge was a preexisting relationship, it was not “receive[d] while acting within the scope of his or her agency” (id.
  • interference with store’s care, the duty assigned

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Maag, Welch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.