Bryant v. Bryant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a judicial act involves the exercise of discretion or judgment, in contrast to a ministerial act in which “the duty to be performed is described by law with such certainty that nothing is left to the exercise of discretion or judgment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ghadimi v. Soraya
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-08-30· cited 32×
• Fields v. Oates
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-09-11· cited 26×
• Gillette v. Lanier
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1965-10-19· cited 12×
• Counterman v. Counterman
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1967-11-10· cited 9×
• MacNeil v. Vance
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1936-09-21· cited 6×
• Villalba v. Villalba
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-03-10· cited 6×
• Perrin, Jr. v. Perrin Properties, Inc.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1939-01-09· cited 1×
• Judge v. Judge
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-10-17

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Reclamation District No. 535 v. Hamilton
  California Supreme Court· 1896-05-13· cited 19×
• Garden Development Co. v. Carlaw
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1928-02-06· cited 12×
• Havens v. Stiles
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1902-01-25· cited 8×
• Davidson v. Munsey
  Utah Supreme Court· 1903-12-10· cited 8×