Bryan v. Yungblut

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that personal jurisdiction is not established simply because a “product is sold in the state” or where the stream of commerce “may or will sweep the product into the forum State”
• explaining a “defendant’s introduction of its product into the stream of commerce by selling products to a distributor selling nationwide is, by itself, an insufficient basis for personal jurisdiction.”
• “The Fourth Circuit .. . made clear that a non-resident defendant may only be subject to personal jurisdiction under the ‘stream of commerce’ theory if that defendant engaged in some activity purposely directed at the forum state.”’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).