Bryan v. Rectors & Visitors of the University of Virginia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that refinements in federal medicaid law would be required to advance purposes of EMTALA
• sug gesting that refinements in federal medicaid law would be required to advance purposes of EMTALA
• “EMTALA is quite clear that it is not intended to preempt state tort law except where absolutely necessary.”
• “[T]he stabilization requirement was intended to regulate the hospital’s care of the patient only in the immediate aftermath of the act of admitting her for emergency treatment . . . .”
• “[EMTALA’s] core purpose is to get patients into the system who might otherwise go untreated and be left without a remedy because traditional medical malpractice law affords no claim for failure to treat.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).