Bryan v. Rectors and Visitors

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that EM-TALA’s purpose is “to get patients into the system who might otherwise go untreated and be left without a remedy because traditional medical malpractice law affords no claim for failure to treat.”
• “[EMTALA’s] core purpose is to get patients into the system who might otherwise go untreated and be left without a remedy.”
• “[EM-TALA’s] core purpose is to get patients into the system who might otherwise go untreated and be left without a remedy because traditional medical malpractice law affords no claim for failure to treat.”
• EMTALA only covers 23 stabilizing treatment “in connection with a possible transfer” and not “long-term care within the 24 system”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).