Bryan v. Murphy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Reconsideration [under Local Rule 7.2(E) ] is only ‘absolutely necessary’ where there is: (1) newly discovered evidence; (2) an intervening development or change in controlling law; or (3) a need to correct a clear error of law or fact.”
• first citing Brogdon ex rel. Cline v. Nat’l Healthcare Corp., 103 F. Supp. 2d 1322, 1338 (N.D. Ga. 2000); and then citing Johnson v. United States, No. Civ. A. 1:96CV1757JOF, 1999 WL 691871, at (N.D. Ga. July 14, 1999)
• “Parties may not use a motion for reconsideration as an opportunity to show the court how it ‘could have done it better.’” (quoting Pres. Endangered Areas of Cobb’s History, Inc. v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng’rs, 916 F. Supp. 1557, 1560 (N.D. Ga. 1995)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).