Bryan Keith Johnson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• (“Johnson’s need for the [excluded] testimony to raise the defense of promiscuity was great – no other evidence of promiscuity is in the record.”
• “The State has not demonstrated how the [excluded] testimony in unfairly prejudicial to it, particularly in light of the fact that the defense to which the testimony was relevant was a statutory defense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).