· 7/16/1953
Bruzaud v. Matthews
Citations
- 207 F.2d 25
- 93 U.S. App. D.C. 47
- 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 2820
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Since in this case an indictment had been returned and a copy of it was attached, ho purpose was served by attaching also a copy of the earlier affidavit made by the complaining witness, and it should be regarded as mere surplusage, as far as the requisition is concerned.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Miller, Fahy, Washington
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.