Brush v. World Fire & Marine Ins.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that, unlike in Summers, the NPS did have to consider policy issues in identifying hazards and choosing how to warn
• observing that, unlike in Summers, the NPS did have to consider policy issues in identifying hazards and choosing how to warn
• holding policy was discretionary because it did not “set out 3 the specific means” by which government employees were to “identify hazards” and “protect 4 park visitors”
• reviewing the same policies in connection with an alleged failure to warn of a natural hazard at a • national park
• addressing the government’s discretion to “determin[e] the precise manner in which to warn” of hazards
• discretionary function exception applied to park's decision not to take additional safety precautions other than maintaining bridge and posting six warning signs around it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).