Brunson v. Tracy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the petitioner’s prosecutorial misconduct claim did not provide a basis for habeas review when the Second Department had found that the petitioner had failed to preserve the claim for appeal
• holding that the petitioner’s prosecutorial misconduct claim did not provide a basis for habeas review when the Appellate Division had found that the petitioner had failed to preserve the claim for appeal
• “The Supreme Court has held that ‘if the prosecutor’s remarks were “invited,” and did no more than respond substantially in order to “right the scale,” such comments [do] not warrant reversing a conviction.’” (brackets in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).