Skip to main content
· 5/8/1916

Brunson v. Teague

Citations

  • 123 Ark. 594
  • 186 S.W. 78
  • 1916 Ark. LEXIS 515

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • disagreeing with Fortune and holding that a police officer could not testify to the results of a presumptive field test absent. a sufficient evidentiary foundation testified to by a scientific expert

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.