Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 11/3/1987
Brunsoman v. Seltz
Citations
- 414 N.W.2d 547
- 1987 Minn. App. LEXIS 4975
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- basic requirement is that the es-topped party’s interests have been sufficiently represented in the first action so that the application of collateral estoppel is not inequitable
- “Privity exists where the record demonstrates controlling participation and active self-interest in the litigation” and requires that the estopped party’s interests were represented sufficiently in the prior action that application of collateral estoppel is not inequitable
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Heard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Valley National Bank v. A.E. Rouse & Co.Ninth Circuit· 1997-08-11· cited 120×
- Sondel v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 1995-06-06· cited 17×
- Faber v. AlthoffCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-11-27· cited 12×
- State v. VictorsenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-04-18· cited 12×
- Reil v. BenjaminCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1998-10-06· cited 11×
- Denzer v. FrischCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-10-18· cited 11×
- White Consolidated Industries, Inc. v. WaterhouseD. Minnesota· 1994-09-09· cited 10×
- Falk v. Hecker (In Re Falk)D. Minnesota· 1988-07-27· cited 9×
- Houlihan v. FimonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1990-05-01· cited 8×
- State Ex Rel. Friends of the Riverfront v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2008-06-24· cited 7×
- Tatge v. Chandler (In Re Judiciary Tower Associates)District of Columbia· 1994-07-12· cited 6×
- Sunseri v. ProctorE.D. Michigan· 2006-11-30· cited 6×
- Tower Insurance Co. v. Minnesota Holstein-Freisan Breeders' Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-02-22· cited 4×
- Sondel v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 1995-08-01· cited 3×
- Crossman v. LockwoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2006-04-18· cited 3×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court· 1979-01-09· cited 4,229×
- Ellis v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil RightsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-05-28· cited 109×
- Hentschel v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1967-09-15· cited 54×
- Margo-Kraft Distributors, Inc. v. Minneapolis Gas Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1972-08-11· cited 41×
- Louis J. Detrio v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1959-03-10· cited 26×
- Miller v. Northwestern National Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-08-28· cited 20×
- Prado North Residences v. Prado North Condo. Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama· 1985-10-04· cited 11×
- Engelstad v. Cargill, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-07-15· cited 9×
- Brunsoman v. Lexington-SilverwoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-04-15· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.