Brunsoman v. Seltz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• basic requirement is that the es-topped party’s interests have been sufficiently represented in the first action so that the application of collateral estoppel is not inequitable
• “Privity exists where the record demonstrates controlling participation and active self-interest in the litigation” and requires that the estopped party’s interests were represented sufficiently in the prior action that application of collateral estoppel is not inequitable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).