Skip to main content
· 1/25/1936

Brunsilius v. Farmers & Merchants State Bank

Citations

  • 143 Kan. 148
  • 53 P.2d 476
  • 1936 Kan. LEXIS 292

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding under the plain language interpretation of construction lien act, “residential structure” is a structure in which the owner actually intends to reside
  • holding that a party was not unjustly enriched because the only benefit -5- the party received was the result of a contract between two other entities, and the party did not request the benefit or mislead the entities to the agreement
  • stating that this Court will not consider evidence “that was not before the trial court at the time of the motion hearing”
  • providing that if a party satisfies the two elements of an unjust- enrichment claim, “the law will imply a contract to prevent the unjust enrichment.”
  • stating that once the moving party meets its burden of supporting its position that there is no factual dispute, the burden shifts to the opposing party to show that a genuine issue of material fact exists
  • stating that once the moving party meets its burden of supporting its position that there is no factual dispute, the burden shifts to the opposing party to show that a genuine issue of material fact exists

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harvey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.