Bruno v. Western Union Financial Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, when considering cases involving liability for intervening criminal acts, D.C. courts “apply a heightened foreseeability standard in determining whether [the defendant] had a duty of care”
• discussing several cases involving liability for intervening criminal conduct where “liability was rejected as a matter of law because ‘foreseeability (hence duty
• taking judicial notice of maps to identify distance between two places
• violent robbery in a gas station

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).