Skip to main content
· 7/15/2014

Bruno Mpoy v. Michelle Rhee

Citations

  • 411 U.S. App. D.C. 94
  • 758 F.3d 285
  • 38 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1317
  • 2014 WL 3407531
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 13388
  • 307 Educ. L. Rep. 627

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • questioning whether Lane 's\use of the adjective 'ordinary' ... could signal a narrowing of the realm of employee speech left unprotected by Garcetti \
  • “[T]he use of the adjective ‘ordinary’— which the court repeated nine times— could signal a narrowing of the realm of employee speech left unprotected by Garcetti.”
  • “In particular, the use of the adjective ‘ordinary’—which the [CJourt repeated nine times—could signal a narrowing of the realm of employee speech left unprotected by Garcetti.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garland, Henderson, Srinivasan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.