Skip to main content
· 11/19/1992

Brunner v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.

Citations

  • 603 N.E.2d 206
  • 413 Mass. 698
  • 1992 Mass. LEXIS 578
  • 60 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 985

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • granting summary judgment for defendant where plaintiff failed to offer sufficient evidence to carry the burden of persuasion on employer’s discriminatory motive
  • “where motive, intent, or other state of mind questions are at issue, summary judgment is often inappropriate”
  • summary judgment for defendant where plaintiff failed to offer evidence sufficient to carry burden of persuasion on employer’s discriminatory motive
  • in an employment discrimination case, evidence of the bias of the decision-maker may be essential to proof of discrimination
  • summary judgment was appropriate where the plaintiff had not rebutted legitimate business reasons, including decline in the workload, proffered by the defendant
  • where motive, intent or state of mind questions are at issue, summary judgment is often inappropriate because they are factual questions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Liacos, Wilkins, Nolan, Lynch, O'Connor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.