Brunner v. Hampson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where the plaintiff cannot show jurisdiction under the Ohio long-arm statute a Due Process analysis No. 10-3526 Conn v. Zakharov Page 5 is unnecessary
• explaining that the non-resident defendant’s arranging of a trip to Canada for Ohio residents through e-mail, fax, and telephone did not amount to “supply[ing] services or goods” in Ohio
• explaining that a Canadian company arranging a hunting trip to Canada for an Ohio resident by telephone, fax, email, and mail did not provide a factual basis to support that the company contracted to supply any goods or services in Ohio
• finding it unnecessary to reach the due process analysis where personal jurisdiction over the defendant was lacking under Ohio’s long-arm statute (citation omitted)
• finding it unnecessary to reach the due process analysis where personal jurisdiction over the defendant was lacking under Ohio’s long-arm statute (citation omitted)
• negligence, loss of consortium, and wrongful death claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).