California Court of Appeal· 3/24/2008
Bruni v. Didion
Citations
- 73 Cal. Rptr. 3d 395
- 160 Cal. App. 4th 1272
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a court must consider a contract formation challenge before compelling arbitration in a dispute involving home buyers, builders, and an HBW warranty
- finding that arbitration provisions in an adhesion contract violated the plaintiffs’ reasonable expectations where the provisions were “unforeseeably broad” and “well beyond a layperson’s reasonable expectations”
- “A court, however, still must consider one type of challenge to the overall contract; a claim that the party resisting arbitration never actually agreed to be bound.”
- “The petitioner bears the burden of proving the existence 1 petition bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence any fact necessary to its 2 defense.”
- “[C]ourts must ‘apply ordinary state-law 6 principles that govern the formation of contracts.’”
- “The petitioner bears the burden of proving the existence of a valid arbitration agreement by the preponderance of the evidence, and a party opposing the petition bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence any fact necessary to its defense.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Richli
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 2009-07-03· cited 134×
- Parada v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2009-08-26· cited 102×
- Citizens Business Bank v. GevorgianCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2013-08-01· cited 77×
- Greenspan v. LADT, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2010-06-25· cited 70×
- Tiri v. Lucky Chances, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2014-05-15· cited 68×
- Brown v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal· 2008-11-25· cited 64×
- Malone v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2014-06-17· cited 46×
- Chin v. Advanced Fresh Concepts Franchise Corp.California Court of Appeal· 2011-04-20· cited 41×
- Ashburn v. AIG Financial Advisors, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2015-02-06· cited 36×
- Ontiveros v. DHL Express (USA), Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2008-06-30· cited 35×
- Arguelles-Romero v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2010-05-20· cited 32×
- Sanchez v. Western Pizza Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2009-03-17· cited 32×
- COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY v. Universal Paragon Corp.California Court of Appeal· 2010-09-21· cited 32×
- Hartley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2011-06-28· cited 28×
- Plazza v. Airbnb, Inc.S.D. Illinois· 2018-01-26· cited 24×
- Thompson v. Lithia Chrysler Jeep DodgeMontana Supreme Court· 2008-05-20· cited 23×
- Schumacher Homes of Circleville v. John and Carolyn SpencerWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2016-06-13· cited 22×
- Loewen v. Lyft, Inc.N.D. California· 2015-09-15· cited 21×
- Newton v. American Debt Services, Inc.N.D. California· 2012-02-22· cited 19×
- Mattingly v. Palmer Ridge Homes, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-08-05· cited 16×
Cites
63 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court· 1960-06-20· cited 5,791×
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court· 1995-05-22· cited 4,743×
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 4,474×
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 2,844×
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court· 2002-12-10· cited 1,948×
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court· 1996-06-03· cited 1,668×
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court· 2006-02-21· cited 1,641×
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court· 2000-08-24· cited 1,269×
- Connie A. Nagrampa v. Mailcoups, Inc. The American Arbitration AssociationNinth Circuit· 2006-12-04· cited 1,006×
- Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1997-06-30· cited 717×
- Rosenthal v. Great Western Financial Securities Corp.California Supreme Court· 1996-12-12· cited 513×
- Webb v. Investacorp, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1996-07-26· cited 418×
- Discover Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 2005-06-27· cited 370×
- Madden v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-08-10· cited 275×
- Graham v. Scissor-Tail, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1981-02-05· cited 267×
- A & M PRODUCE CO. v. FMC Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1982-08-27· cited 259×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 2000-07-21· cited 237×
- Stewart v. Preston Pipeline Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2005-12-20· cited 237×
- Perdue v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Supreme Court· 1985-07-18· cited 232×
- Terminix International Co. LP v. Palmer Ranch Ltd. PartnershipEleventh Circuit· 2005-12-16· cited 202×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.