Brungardt v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because negligence claim failed as a matter of law because it was “wholly dependent upon [a] shooting, an occurrence that is specifically excluded from coverage” under the applicable unambiguous firearm exclusion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).