Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 9/23/1970
Bruner v. State
Citations
- 463 S.W.2d 205
- 1970 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1200
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the TSA‘s highly penal nature requires that the act be strictly construed
- concluding that the TSA’s highly penal nature requires that the act be strictly construed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Onion
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Cuellar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-02-13· cited 135×
- Cox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-05-28· cited 42×
- McConathy v. Dal Mac Commercial Real Estate, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1976-12-28· cited 18×
- People v. GrahamCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1985-01-24· cited 15×
- Plorin v. Bedrock Foundation & House Leveling Co.Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1988-05-26· cited 10×
- Lyon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1989-03-15· cited 7×
- State v. JohnsonTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2006-09-13· cited 7×
- Bailey v. StateTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2004-10-20· cited 7×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Koscot Interplanetary, Inc.N.D. Georgia· 1973-04-19· cited 5×
- Thomas v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1999-08-27· cited 5×
- Cross v. DFW South Entry PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1982-02-18· cited 3×
- Manley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1989-06-21· cited 2×
- State v. Craig Hill JohnsonTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2006-05-17
- Cameron O. Bailey v. StateTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2004-08-31
- Michael Murphy v. Ernest Reynolds IIITex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2011-09-29
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court· 1946-10-14· cited 1,616×
- Tcherepnin v. KnightSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 878×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. C. M. Joiner Leasing Corp.Supreme Court· 1943-11-22· cited 680×
- D. H. Roe and Stratoray Oil, Inc. v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1961-05-23· cited 129×
- State v. Gopher Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1920-05-28· cited 105×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. United Benefit Life InsuranceSupreme Court· 1967-05-22· cited 102×
- Allan v. Chapman, Jr. v. Rudd Paint & Varnish Company, Dave Rivers and Alan ParkNinth Circuit· 1969-03-20· cited 89×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Universal Service Ass'nSeventh Circuit· 1939-06-23· cited 62×
- People v. SydeCalifornia Supreme Court· 1951-09-28· cited 48×
- Penfield Co. of Cal. v. Securities and Exch. Com'nNinth Circuit· 1944-07-19· cited 47×
- Blackwell v. BentsenFifth Circuit· 1953-07-27· cited 44×
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. PayneS.D. New York· 1940-11-15· cited 42×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. BaileyS.D. Florida· 1941-10-31· cited 29×
- R. A. Haberman, Jr., Independent of the Estate of Elizabeth H. Gravis, Deceased v. The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesFifth Circuit· 1955-09-16· cited 26×
- Georgia Market Centers, Inc. v. FortsonSupreme Court of Georgia· 1969-12-04· cited 20×
- United States v. Walter E. Herr and William O. GillentineSeventh Circuit· 1964-12-08· cited 19×
- Emery v. So-Soft of Ohio, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals· 1964-06-04· cited 15×
- Darwin v. Jess Hickey Oil CorporationN.D. Texas· 1957-06-17· cited 14×
- Hollywood State Bank v. WildeCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1945-07-10· cited 14×
- Koscot Interplanetary, Inc. v. KingCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1970-03-11· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.