Bruner v. Seelbach Hotel Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A] great deal of deference is owed to the ‘Coast Guard’s expertise . . . in maritime safety.’”
• “[I]t would be odd to require the Coast Guard to provide terms and conditions for each NEPA alternative, given that several alternatives were jettisoned without detailed consideration for various reasons.”
• “Given the statutory and regulatory text … BOEM did not violate the Migratory Bird Treaty Act by merely approving a project that, if ultimately constructed, might result in the taking of migratory birds.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).