Bruner v. Baker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Section 1983 claims against public officials must demonstrate some form of personal involvement on the part of the individual defendants.”
• “Section 1983 claims against public officials must demonstrate some form of personal involvement on the part of the individual defendants.”
• “Because [the defendant] has failed to point to any similarly situated individuals, let alone similarly situated individuals treated differently, his class-of-one equal protection claim must fail.”
• “In order to state a § 1983 claim, a plaintiff must allege the violation of a [constitutional right], and must show that the alleged deprivation was committed by a person acting under color of state law.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[W]here there is a question of fact or ‘room for a difference of opinion’ about the existence of probable cause, it is a proper question for a jury, even though it is normally determined by a court during the warrant application process.”
• “An arrest is valid . . . if the warrant underlying it was supported by probable cause at the time of its issuance; this holds true even if later events establish that the target of the warrant should not have been arrested.” (quotation simplified)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).