Ohio Court of Appeals· 8/1/2024
Bruner Holdings, L.L.C. v. Sleeper
Citations
- 248 N.E.3d 978
- 2024 Ohio 2925
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in determining appellees asserted a meritorious defense in support of their Civ.R. 60(B) motion and motion to vacate, but the trial court erred in ruling on the validity of the asserted meritorious defense. The trial court additionally erred in determining it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over the cognovit action.
Judges: Luper Schuster
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 1976-07-21· cited 2,230×
- Strack v. PeltonOhio Supreme Court· 1994-08-31· cited 507×
- Harris v. AndersonOhio Supreme Court· 2006-05-03· cited 101×
- Ostanek v. Ostanek (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-07-13· cited 35×
- Pankey v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-30· cited 30×
- State ex rel. DeBlase v. Ohio Ballot Bd.Ohio Supreme Court· 2023-06-01· cited 30×
- Smith v. Ohio State Univ.Ohio Supreme Court· 2024-03-06· cited 18×
- Pointer v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-06-30· cited 10×
- Starner v. Merchants Holding, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-03-29· cited 7×
- Ltd. Invest. Group Corp. v. Huntington Natl. BankOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-10-13· cited 6×
- Meyer v. ChieffoOhio Court of Appeals· 2008-12-16· cited 5×
- HSBC Mtge. Corp. v. LatonaOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-05-24· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.