Skip to main content
· 8/21/1997

Brundage v. Hahn

Citations

  • 57 Cal. App. 4th 228
  • 66 Cal. Rptr. 2d 830
  • 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6740
  • 7 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 286
  • 97 Daily Journal DAR 10923
  • 1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 665

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming summary judgment on an employee’s ADA and FEHA disparate treatment claims because the employer could not have discriminated on the basis of a disability of which it did not know
  • “Reasonable accommodation does not include excusing a failure to control a controllable disability or giving an employee a ‘second chance’ to control the disability in the future.”
  • “Vague or conclusory statements revealing an unspecified incapacity are not sufficient to put an employer on notice of its obligations under the ADA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grignon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.