Brummagim v. Tallant

Citations

29 Cal. 503

Syllabus

<p>Statute of Limitations on Certificate of Deposit.—The Statute of Limitations begins to run against a banker’s certificate of deposit, payable on demand, from tbe date of tbe same,, and no special demand is necessary to put it m motion.</p> <p>Certificate of Deposit.—In substance and legal effect a certificate of deposit and promissory note are tbe same.</p>

Judges: Sanderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Bank of Am. Nat'l Trust & Sav. Ass'n v. Cranston
California Court of Appeal· 1967-06-30· cited 27×
Poorman v. D. O. Mills & Co.
California Supreme Court· 1868-07-01· cited 27×
O'Neil v. Magner
California Supreme Court· 1889-12-06· cited 25×
In Re Las Colinas, Inc.
D. Puerto Rico· 1968-12-04· cited 24×
Mitchell v. Easton
Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1887-07-29· cited 13×
Gabriel v. Wells Fargo Bank
California Court of Appeal· 2010-08-30· cited 5×
Gutch v. Fosdick
New Jersey Court of Chancery· 1891-05-15· cited 2×
Bartlett v. Rogers
U.S. Circuit Court· 1874-06-08· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Minturn v. Fisher
California Supreme Court· 1854-01-15· cited 17×
Laughlin v. Marshall
Illinois Supreme Court· 1857-12-15· cited 14×
Bank of Peru v. Farnsworth
Illinois Supreme Court· 1857-04-15· cited 11×
Carey v. McDougald
Supreme Court of Georgia· 1849-07-15· cited 8×

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.