Brumley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defining “competent evidence” as “relevant evidence that does not fit within any rule of exclusion”
• “Competent evidence is matter probative of the fact to be proved; that is, relevant evidence that does not fit within any rule of exclusion. Evidence is substantial if a reasonable mind might accept it to support a conclusion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Sigler v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-05· cited 16×
• Bussell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-08-04· cited 14×
• Michelson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-05· cited 12×
• State of Florida v. Kyle R. Queior
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2016-04-21· cited 10×
• O'ROURKE v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-11-18· cited 6×
• Christina Prinz v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-08-20· cited 2×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Richardson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1971-03-31· cited 927×
• Hall v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-07-03· cited 8×
• Carroll v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-05-12· cited 3×