Brum v. Conley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that under similar statute, where “no evidence of unnecessary hardship exists and two contiguous lots have been purchased under single ownership after the effective date of the zoning ordinance... [t]he lots should... be merged----”
• despite qualifying as a nonconforming use as to area at the time of the ordinance’s enactment, the parcels merged because the ordinance expressly stated that “[i]f two (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).