Brujis v. Shaw

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that fiduciary shield doctrine did not protect senior corporate officers because they “made a conscious decision to conduct business in Illinois through allegedly deceptive practices, and they must answer in Illinois for the consequences of that decision”
• declining to apply fiduciary shield doctrine to defendant who owned a vast majority of the corporation’s shares
• in determining whether the fiduciary shield doctrine applies, “fairness is the key; courts look at the quality and nature of defendant’s acts in Illinois____”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).