Skip to main content
· 12/21/1880

Bruhn & Williams v. National Bank

Citations

  • 54 Tex. 152
  • 1880 Tex. LEXIS 140

Syllabus

<p>1. Jurisdiction.—The record in a suit in debt on a promissory note disclosed the beginning of the action in the county court, and its termination by a judgment in the district court, but revealed no cause for the transfer of jurisdiction. The debt claimed to be due was on a promissory note for §328.95, less credits indorsed: Meld, that if the suit was properly cognizable in the district court, it was only in the exercise of some special jurisdiction, in favor of which no presumption must be indulged.</p>

Judges: Bonner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.