Bruhn v. Firemen's Building Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “better approach is to shift the burden to the [insurrers]”
• applying but-for test where mental illness exclusion included “due to” language
• “[W]hile subjective reports of pain are difficult to prove, they should be accorded some weight on the ledger.”
• collecting cases and describing issue as “unsettled”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).