Brugier v. Miller
Citations
- 114 La. 419
- 38 So. 404
- 1905 La. LEXIS 481
Syllabus
<p>APPEAL — PARTIES—INTERVENTION—INJUNCTION.</p> <p>1. One who has not been cited in a proceeding culminating in a judgment from which an appeal is taken is not a necessary party to such appeal.</p> <p>2. One who occupies the status and discloses the interest required by law may intervene by way of opposition in a proceeding via exeeutiva, though no injunction be prayed for or obtained.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the \constitutional requirements\ that govern personal jurisdiction \caution against a liberal application of forum selection clauses to non-signatory defendants\
- explaining that a patent assignment could support a conversion claim, but the patentable idea itself could not
- finding PowerPoint presentations discussing biotech company’s idea for a kind of genetically modified wheat not subject to conversion
- conducting a minimum contacts analysis because “constitutional requirements caution against a liberal application of forum selection clauses to non- signatory defendants”
- conducting a minimum contacts analysis because “constitutional requirements caution against a liberal application of forum selection clauses to non-signatory defendants”
- denying plaintiff’s attempt to enforce an NDA against an entity that was not an affiliate at the time the NDA was signed as contrary to New York contract law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Monroe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.