Skip to main content
· 5/15/1914

Bruen v. Reynolds

Citations

  • 163 A.D. 890
  • 147 N.Y.S. 1101
  • 1914 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6185

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that period of limitation language “after the happening of the loss” “did not begin to run until the assured was in a position to institute action against the insurance company”
  • construing ambiguous limitation clause against drafter, where such clause could have been worded in unmistakable and decisive language

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.