Brucks v. Coca-Cola Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the argument that failure to provide documents “‘relevant’ to a claim for benefits under C.F.R. § 2560.503–1(g) or its current equivalent constitutes a failure to provide information ‘required by this subchapter’ under Section 1132(c)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).