Skip to main content
· 1/23/1984

Bruchac v. Universal Cab. Co.

Citations

  • 580 F. Supp. 295
  • 5 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1697
  • 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20190

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the Amo ry presumption against the forfeiture of benefits and concluding that plaintiffs right to benefits was governed by the language of the pension plan
  • the provision of severance pay in exchange for a waiver of rights is insufficient to defeat the nonforfeiture provisions of ERISA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dowd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.