· 1/23/1984
Bruchac v. Universal Cab. Co.
Citations
- 580 F. Supp. 295
- 5 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1697
- 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20190
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting the Amo ry presumption against the forfeiture of benefits and concluding that plaintiffs right to benefits was governed by the language of the pension plan
- the provision of severance pay in exchange for a waiver of rights is insufficient to defeat the nonforfeiture provisions of ERISA
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dowd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.