Skip to main content
W.D. Virginia· 2/16/1984

Bruce v. Smith

Citations

  • 581 F. Supp. 902
  • 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19415

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Naming unknown, fictitious, or ‘John Doe’ defendants in a complaint does not toll the statute of limitations until such time as the names of these parties can be secured. Instead, it amounts to a change of parties under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(c
  • same attorney represented original and additional defendants at all times from institution of suit, such that relation back of amendments substituting individual police officers in place of fictitious defendants allowed
  • informal notice of commencement of action sufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kiser

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.