Court of Appeals of Virginia· 4/16/1996
Bruce v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 469 S.E.2d 64
- 22 Va. App. 264
- 1996 Va. App. LEXIS 268
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that burglary requires that “the intent to commit the -8- substantive crime therein is concomitant with the breaking and entering”
- recognizing that burglary requires that “the intent to commit the substantive crime therein is concomitant with the breaking and entering”
- recognizing that burglary requires that “the intent to commit the substantive crime therein is concomitant with the breaking and entering”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baker, Coleman, Elder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Martin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1992-01-21· cited 176×
- Bright v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1987-05-19· cited 153×
- Jones v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1986-10-21· cited 61×
- Johnson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1981-03-06· cited 55×
- State v. WardSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1876-02-15· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.